Facts around September 11th:

 

 

The strangest things happen:

 

In the one hundred thousand tons of rubble in which till now not once two flight recorders were found after the fireballs a passport of one shall allegedly kidnapper has been found. (except for this miracle, that the terrorist shortly before the hit or after it pushed it through the window why did he needed a passport for what on an inner American flight?)

 

Osama bin Laden denied repeatedly his fault. (and had it also – in contrary to contrary assertions. – admitted. in none of the videos) – instead of boasting about a successful precision hit. Which sense has Terror, if it is being denied by the Terrorists? How will he ever aim his goals then?

 

A man reports and asks for cut of the list of potential kidnappers instead of lying in the rubble deadly.

 

The U.S. government which wasn't able to protect its main place despite NMD threat scenarios. (not by CIA or FBI or NSA or technically by Air Force) is able to define the terror as an attack of the outside and to mark the head suspicious as well as to provide the way as you should spend in travelling with terrorists now within hours. (Which is also connected that Atta was already shadowed by U.S. authorities earlier in Germany?.)

 

And no one speak about the bomb in front of the State Department. The International Herald  Tribune still knew to report on the 12^th .09: “In Washington, a fire was reported on the National Mall and a car bomb exploded outside the State Department.“ – and cancelled this report of: “A report of an explosion at the US Capitol was later retraced“.

 

Assassin Atta (?) enters the airport-check 7 minutes before take off (5:53h) (according to other details 5:45h. Both times are under each other on the photo. – which is a technically miracle.) The photo with the 5:53h-datail in the lowest picture part is sometimes cut off– that means without the 5:53h. Only a man can be seen. If this was Atta,, can't be stated beyond all doubt. Yes, he must be a wizard, all events everything till the last minute before the take-off ...

 

If the cameras picture regularly picture everything at the check, why do you only see the photo of Atta and why only from the Conveyer flight.? Such photos/videos really then should be existing of all assassins.

 

How does it come that a proper check-in is being allowed and 2 baggages were allowed to be accepted, namely the 2 journey bags with all arbitrary indications which then haven't allegedly made the changing to Boston any more? Which airway lets still the ribbons go with pieces of baggage 5-7 minutes before the take-off? If people who arrive shortly before the take-off are taken with at all then they take the baggage directly along into the airplane.

 

How do one know through the passenger lists who were the kidnappers? One is just searching for "Arabs"? Then were there any indications otherwise that X sat at the control column, except this that under this Arab ones X  had a pilot license ?

 

 

Why has no-one of the kidnapped at their last calls over mobiles informed that they are Arabs who high jacked the plane? .Or have I missed something at the reports of the belonging one, who partly especially have asked what kind of highjackers they are? A stewardess anyways had passed through by mobile telephone other seat numbers than these which were allegedly held by the Arabs!

 

Why do we not hear anything about the famous "last seconds", at least from the moment of the kidnapping? Even if after this every radio traffic would have been broken off with the ground stations, at least there must have been a single word, a talk, a scream between the pilots among each other  or with the kidnapper have been taken place Even if after this the throat would have been cut or the radio would have been switched off. Nothing. We hear nothing, although several ground stations were involved  – and they tape every beep! Although the two black boxes from the last plane which crashed in Pennsylvania are existing. Nothing. Not even the lack of this information is explained or tried to explain. It a simple news blackout about a completely insensitive topic. It cannot be (really, really) military secrets, the people are dead and the world press also passes over personal details at every other similar case. There, they place “...“ for prayers or curses or groan. Why therefore being silent?

 

To „identify“ the assassins as Muslima/Arabs began already hours after the assassinations  There were found Flight documents in Arabic language in cars which were parking in front of the airports. And nobody stops short: The official language in Germany is German.. Everyone who clicks on www.un.org sees the official Language of the UNO. The language in the international air traffic is English. Not Arabic. So what kind of flight books are these? The ones to learn how to fly (English) or maybe the instruction menu for the equipments? For the Cockpits of the large Arabic Airplane-industry with is large Arabic-speaking market for gyro compasses, artificial horizons, Jet engine temperature indications? So: Which Flight documents in Arabic language can these be which immediately turn the “track“ in the direction of the Islamists/bin Laden?

 

Why had they flight instructions and manuals in  the baggage and in the trunk of the found car at all? Have they already had learnt enough? Did they really had to carry books with them?

 

The Guardian, 31.11.2001: E.g. one could ask there: If from the at the present time about  1200 arrested persons in the USA up to now no one could be brought in a direct connection with the  11^th.9  (it rather is illegal immigration and like that bad crimes.), but perhaps you can press out something in the detention's while awaiting trial...

 

(Aus: www.medienanalyse-international.de/finger.html: Die Finger der Hand)

 

 

Wrong translation as an evidence:

 

And the propaganda war also goes on. Last week the American government presented an amateur video in English translation., that shows Bin Laden in the circle of retinue people., and which is according to president Bush „a devastating fault admission.“ of Bin Ladens.

 

MONITOR has got itself the Arabian text version of the videotape of the American State Department. and got it analysed by independent and sworn Arabian as well as German linguists and Orientalists.

 

And see there: the English translation presented by the U.S. government of the world public isn't only partly manipulated, but even contains fault . (...):

 

Dr. Abdel EL M. Husseini, Arabist: „I have carefully checked the translation of the Pentagon. This translation is very problematic. It is in the most important places, which shall prove the guilt of Bin Laden not identically with the Arabian note..“

 

Example  1: According to the Pentagon translation Bin Laden says: “We have calculated the number of the dead bodies of the enemy in advance.“

 

Dr. Murad Alami, Diplom-Translator ““in advance “ is not standing in it. It is wrong. If one starts out from the original version of the Arabian., and there aren't any misunderstandings, that one cannot basically understand this.“

 

Furthermore  the translaters  agree into this, that the sentence in the original under no circumstances contians a futural calculational planning or even a calkuliion of the dead

 

Example : according the Pentagon-translation Bin Laden says: „We had received a message previous Thursday that the event on this day would take place.“

 

Dr. Murad Alami, Diplom-Translator: “previous“ does not exist. The Addition., that this event on the day or on this day would take place., is not to be  listened out in the Arabian original version..“

 

Example  3: According Pentagon Bin Laden says: „We asked each from them to America to go.“

 

Dr. Murad Alami, Diplom-Translator: „The translation wirth “we“ is wrong. „It was demanded by them“, is said in the Arabian originaltext which I had heard. What comes after it as a sentence or as an Addition. is incomprehensible.“

 

Three example of many which may let  doubt the proof prower of the video. (...).

 

(aus: Monitor: Nr.486 am 20.12.2001)

 

 

The hot judge:

 

Armed forces tribunals for terrorists, Eavesdrop of defense counsels. – General Attorney  Ashcroft suspends the state under the rule of law in the USA.

 

Who soever made himself suspicious.in the terror Reich of the Taliban had few chances left:

Any foreigner the dictators regarded as a security risk disappeared behind bars. He could be held tight there as long as it seemed right to the highest war lords without judicial decisions. All conversations with the public defenders were bugged. Came the accused in front of court  – where ever in the world -, no professional judge decided over him but an armed forces tribunal. Charges and proofs were read out only behind locked doors.. It wasn't said where the proofs came from. Witnesses appeared incognito. Also accusations from "Hearsays" were authorized? How big the jury was, who the jury and who selected them - everything was secret. The death penalty also could be imposed., if only two thirds of the jury (all armed forces) were for it. There wasn't vocation against the verdict. Prosecutor, judge defender, hangman - all positions appointed with members of the security system.

 

This description has a hook: It isn't from Kabul, it comes from Washington. This is not  Taliban-Law, but the Special justice, with which the president George W. Bush and his General Attourny John Ashcroft from now on want to off Topterrorists . The religious Ahscroft, member of a protestant sect, which even forbids to dance, passed two weeks ago a controversial  "Emergency decree“.  This allows it to the Generall Attorney  in certain cases, to bug the conversations between arrested ones and advocates. About 100 prisoners are already supervised.. „Abominable“, the chairman of the defense counsels., Irwin Schwartz, complained  „if we cannot speak with our clients confidentially., then we can leave it at all. And if this happens the constitutional right is being violated. The Imagination that „people whose guilt is not prooven“, are treated like this in the demokcatic motherland USA is  „monstrous.“, the chairwoman of the Center for National Security Studies, Kate Martin said. Attorney Gernerall Ashcroft remainded hard"The American constitution" doesn't apply to the enemies of the USA. (...) The “Advocate committee.for Human rights“ asked: “If countries like Peru, Egypt and Colombia do things like this, then our Statedepartment starts protesting. What are we going to tell them in future?“

 

In congress not only liberal senator as Patrick J.Leahy protest: „Bush signals the world that it is now acceptable to carrying out. , Secret processes and military law if the defendant is a foreigner.“ Also republicans mutinied. But they have not that much power to abolish the „emergency decrees“, which Bush as High comander of the forces had passed. Instead of bringing the guilty ones before a  UN-War-criminal-tribunal, as in the Bsnia war, Bush now undermines with his "adventurous decree" "exactly the values and principles which he tries to protect"the “New York Times“ wrote: “ Every dictator would admire this..“

 

(Aus: Der Stern, Ausgabe 48, Seite 40)

 

 

Interisting  statements frommthe magazine “Explizit-Islam“:

 

For the USA there is only one region which is worth to fight for.. The area from the Persian Gulf to the Caspian sea. and to the east to Central Asia. Here are 75 percent of the Worldoil- and 33 percent of the Worldgasreserves are being stored.“

 

(David Tucker, US-Defensemintestery in a military-mangazin)

 

“Who believes the neoconservatives were busy for a while with Afghanistan and the axis of evil, is illusioned. In oposite, the list of enemies is permanently. And with this the list of these states, who try painfull not to get in the sight of the hardliners.“

 

(Zeitschrift: The Nation)

 

„For all people whio havend noticed it yet, we are already in the third world war!“

 

(US-Vize-Präsident Dick Cheney in an  arte-dokumentation)

 

Vice-president Dick Cheney, the main strategist in the White House. (...) said: “We have to avoid by any means neccessary that a state  is created, which can danger the Supremacy of the USA.“ A little more extrem it is being expressed by the ultraconservative US-magazine “Hawk-o-Mania“, which is not positioned far away from the today US-administration. “Saddam Hussein is only one of many heads, who will roll. The gleam of the Arab rulers has faded. the people disdains them. They are finished. We must act! Act quick We have only a litle time leftt. We have to decide: Either we finsh them  or we replace them by new or the whole Middle and Far east falls in the hands of the Faschism-Islamists!“