THE CONCEPT OF THE ENEMY:
A PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATION ATTEMPT
FOR THE CONCEPT OF THE ENEMY:
Since the time of the Greek and the Romans, the European
Thinkers and Historians are used to watch the whole world‑history from
the viewpoint of the European History. Strange Civilisations are only noticed,
if they directly touch the European Mstory. Therefore the European watches the
History of the world only through the History of Europe. Such an small
Viewpoint must have a distort perspective as a consequence.
The average European or American, who gets from his childhood
on only books, in which his own Civilisation and their questions are examined
very detailed and in living colours, while the other parts of the world are
only watched very shortly is nearly all the time a victim of an optical
illusion. He thinks that the culture experiences of the west is very much
higher than the ones of the other world and therefore, that the lifestyle of the
west is the only valid standard, with which all the other lifestyles have to be
measured with. He also thinks that every spiritual Concept, every social
Institution or ethical Worth which is different from the western
"Standard" has to belong to a lower development‑level.
lf you want to recognise the problem of the prejudice against
the Islam, then you will have to begin with the crusades.
The psychoanalysis says us, that so many in the emotions of an
old man, especially the unexplainable liking and disliking, are having their
reasons in the early child‑impressions. Nations and Civilisations are
basically only united individuals. Even their development is linked with the
impressions of their childhood.
The century before the crusades can be called as the childhood
of the west, because for the first time since the breakdown of the west‑roman‑empire,
Europe started to walk on its own cultural way. Under the influence of the
western Christianity the arts began to awake out of their sleeping. Gut of the
rough, unpolished forms of the society in the middle‑age, a new culture‑world
began to crystallise. And just in that critical sensitive level of the
development Europe got a great shock: The crusades. Through the crusades,
Europe tried to show itself as a unity, and that was successful. Never before
or after the crusades, an event had caused so much enthusiasm in Europe. A
rapture ran over Europe, which tore all nations with it and tore for the first
time the walls of sates, tribes and classes down. There were many nations on
the continent, who had no unity, except their believe in Christianity and its
source in the roman empire. But now Christianity got a religious and political
concept. That means, that pope Urban in November 1095, declared the spiritual
constitution of the western civilisation. Through the crusades the conscious of
a cultural unity developed, but in the same time the Islam was shown in the
wrong light in which it is shown up to day. To get the crusade justified
ethical the prophet had to be shown as antichrist and the believe as source of
sexual offence and depravity.
In that time they used to call the Prophet Muhammed (peace be
upon him), who had great honour for all the prophets of the Christianity and
the Judaism, "Mahund". So the mighty rulers managed it to show the
Islam as a deception of the devil and as a destructible outrage.
Is was no coincidence, that the Roland‑song, which
described the victory of the Christians over the Maureen heathen in South
France, was not written in the time of the battle, but three hundred years
later, just before the first crusade. And that it became the "European
anthem" at once, has no one to wonder about. It is also no coincidence,
that this song was the beginning of the European literature.
It is very often like that, that a man, who lost his believe
of his childhood, by the time, has his emotions, who were originally linked
with his childhood, "switched on" for his whole lifetime.
This concept of enemy is kept up by the media, which manages
to increase the fear, which develops by the unknowing. The claims have often no
basic at all. This is recognised very good at the author Karl May. But these
prejudices are found in other media and at other authors too. More or less
hidden.
SUBTLE METHODS OF THE EDUCATION CONCERNING
ISLAM; HERE PRESENTED BY THE AUTHOR KARL MAY:
Karl May travelled only once through the near‑ and far‑east.
(1899‑1900) Many readers have the impression, that his novels are
authentic and experienced by Karl May himself They also have the impression,
that May speaks all oriental languages and dialects. But that is wrong!
Probably May thought the same and therefore was nearly thrown
into the mental asylum because he fell into a crise of identity by his oriental
journey.
But let us now examine his works:
In his works, there is a power struggle between Jesus, as the
God of love and Allah as the God of violence. Therefore Karl May takes two
persons as representatives:
On the one Side it is Kara Ben Nemsi and on the other Side it
is the dopey Hadschi Halef Omar.
It is for sure, that in May's novels the winner is always
Jesus and the European point of view, because Kara Ben Nemsi is the typical
fighter of Christ, who fights against the evil Muslims. lt is also sure, that
the white European is in every aspect better than all the Muslims. Ben Nemsi is
not only unbeatable in the physical and armed aspect, no, he is also a mental
genius. he knows the Quran better than all the Muslims which he meets.
He explains to one Muslim, who he meets, that the Half‑moon,
has its source in Muhammed's (pace be upon him) bloody scimitar. Caliph Osman
had later made it to a symbol of the Osman Empire and therefore of the Islam.
The mistake of May was only, that the scinütar is known in the
Islamic countries since the 14th century. The Europeans and not the Muslims had
connected the Half‑moon with the Islam.
The dopey Haschi Halef Omar therefore says in the End of
"Mater Dolorosa": "Sihdi, once 1 wanted to make you a Muslim,
but the opposite has happened. Now 1 believe too, that the cross is mightier
than Muhammed (Peace be upon him). "
In comprehension The summary of all novels show, that the
Muslims are brutal, dissolute and out‑of‑date. In each aspect, they
are the losers. They are badly armed and undereducated. It is said to them:
"And if hundred thousands of you would come, you would not know how quick
we would finish you. "
For May, Muhammed (peace be upon him) is a heretic and a
violent person, and the Quran is a summary of Christian, Jewish and heathen
thoughts.
THE FAKING OF ISLAMIC INVENTIONS:
Muslims have made great inventions and progressive things in
many aspects of science. But this is not well known, because the west had
hidden it, or faked the invention. And they did it in the past as they do it
today.
Now some examples:
The compass:
It is said, that the Italian Flavo Gioja had intended the
compass about 1302. But 500 years earlier, in the 8th century, Dschabir In
Haiyan had made experiences with a compass.
The black‑powder:
It is said, that the German monk Berthold Schwarz had invented
the powder about 1359 in his cell.
But how can it be then, that in Spain, the knights got panic
and were feared to death in 1325, 1331 and 1341 by the Arabians with their
guns.
Hundred years ago, The King of France believed, that the
Judgement day had come, because of the thunder of the guns at the river Nil.
In the year 1270 the Mongolians used powder‑guns, which
were constructed by Arabian Engineers from Balek and Damascus. Because the
Kublai Khan begged the Sultan to help him. The Mongolian won by the Arabian
Know‑how. In the year 1346 the Knight‑battles ended in the battle
of Cr&i because of the Help of the Arabian devil's pipe
Medicine:
It is said, that in the year 1552, the French surgeon Ambroise
Pard prevented the great blood vessels.
But this was done 600 years ago, by the Arabian Abu'I‑Quasim.
It is said, that the German gynaecologist Walcher (1856‑1935)
invented around 1900 the hanging position at birth‑intervention
"Walcher position", But this invention had been done much earlier by
Abu'I‑Quasim.
It is said, that the German surgeon Frederic Trendelenburg
(1844‑1924) invented the putting up of the pelvis and the feet at the
surgery below the navel "Trendelenburg position".
But even this had been practised a long time ago by Abu'I‑Quasim.
It is said that Percival Pott (1713‑1788) diagnosed
joint‑ and spinal diseases, which went into the medical history.
But this had been diagnosed by Abu'I‑Quasim a long time
ago.
It is said, that the Spanish Michael Servet (1533) and the
English William Harvey (1616) invented the blood circulation. but the blood
circulation is already examined and described in every detail by the chief
doctor of the Nassiri Hospital in Cairo, called Ibn an‑Nafis (12601288)
And so on.
1 do not have the possibility to count up everything: But
there are books which have mentioned the inventions of the Muslims, for example
in geography, astronomy, mathematics, lyric, medicine etc.