THE TRINITY:
When the Christians talk about god, then they
mean the Father, the Son and the holy Ghost. The Trinity, in which they
believe, says, that these three persons are different, divided and each of them
is godly. But for the Christians there are not three Gods, but one, although
each of them has to be accepted as God.
This is a contradiction:
lt would be the same, if 1 would say: "1
add one and one and one and get three and one at the same time. "
The church cannot explain how it can be that
three gods are in one. That is why it declares the Trinity as a
"Mystery" which has to be accepted without questioning.
There are other contradictions too:
lf the Father is God and the Son is God and the
holy Ghost is God, and they are not three "nothings", then they have
to have three different substances, because according to the church, they are
different, divided and all three are godly.
Now if they have three different substances,
then they are also three different Gods.
The next question is, if these three Persons
are mortal or immortal. lf they are immortal, then we have three different
basically forms. That means three immortal, most powerful, godly persons. With
other words: Three Gods.
lf they are mortal, then this would mean, that
there is an immortal Being, which components are mortal. so it has three
manifestations to survive.
But it goes on: lt is said: The Father, the Son
and the holy Ghost are one God.
Now if you have identical triplets and one of
them commits murderer, can you hang one of the two others?
Surely not.
Why not? (They are identical triplets.)
Because each of them has a different
personality.
The same thing is with the Father, the Son and
the Holy Ghost: lf one says "Jesus", he does not think of the Holy
Ghost.
lf then one says "Holy Ghost", he does not
think of the Father. If then one says "Father" he does not think of
the Son.
And it is impossible to unite all these
pictures in your head, if you say "God", except you are crazy.
Jesus himself did not believed in the Trinity,
because he was a Jew and he had the imagination of God, which the Jews had.
The Theologian Wendland also says: Jesus has
never identificated himself with God, or said "P, where he had meant
"God"."
Adolf Harnach is agreeing:
"The sentence: 1 am the Son of God, is not
written in the gospel by Jesus. And the one who adds this sentence to the
others, adds something to the gospel
Jesus has never said, that he is the Son of
God.
He did not claimed to be the bodily son of God,
but only the spiritual aspect. Because: Blessed are the peacemakers: for they
shall be called the children of God, (Mt 5 ‑ 9)
lf he was the bodily son of God, how does it
come, that the name of God does not appear in Jesus family tree.
Jesus also never ordered to worship him, which
he had to order, if he was God. He also never prayed to himself, which he had
to do, if he was God. He also did not have to eat, if he was God. But as an
example it is reported in the end of Luke's gospel, that the disciples saw him
eating.
Jesus would never allow to make himself God.
for him, this would be blasphemy. He did not knew anything about a trinity of
the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, because the teaching of the Trinity was
established nearly 300 years after his death.
In the first centuries of the Christianity,
there was no trinity.
Theodor Hamack: "Because they did not
thought of Jesus being God, no one came on the idea of the existence of a Holy
Ghost. "
Only of one person, the Valentian Theodot, it
is known, that he as the first Christ, named in the late second century the
expression Father, Son and Ghost, "Trias".
But at that time the church was not interested
in the trinity.
Even in the 4th century, the intellectual ones
of the church had their difficulties to proof the unity, twines and trinity of
the godly persons out of the Bible.
The holy bishop and church‑teacher
Basilius proofed the twines of God with Gen 1:26: Und God said, Let us make
man."
Basilius asked, 'Which worker talks to himself?
Don't you recognise by this the twines of the person?"
But the mistake was, that it was forgotten,
that there were and are two plural‑forms:
1. The numeral:
(for example: One person says "I", while
100 persons says "We")
2. The one of respect:
(for example:
"We, by the mercy of God order...
The sentence "Let us make man", shows
that the majestically plural‑form is used here.
But a trinity seems not to be enough, because
the holy Justin recognises a quaternary: Godfather, Jesus, the army of the
angels and the Holy Ghost.
In the 4th century they tried to uplift Mary in
the trinity. Then there would be another form of the quaternary.
(But because the church always had their
problems with women, they finally left it.)
But by the time the Christianity of the angles,
which was until the 4th century very popular in the church, was condemned.
So in the year 325, they created in Nicea the
dogma which has to be true for all Christian Church: Father, Son and Holy
Ghost. From this time on, Jesus has the same and no longer the similar nature
as the Father. (Jesus is identical to the Father)
The battle about the dogma of Christ was fought
victoriously by the unbaptisted, that means heathen, Caesar Constantine because
of political aspects. But this battle was not unbloody.
In the year 325, the Caesar called all bishops
to Nicea, to finally define the status of Jesus for all Christians.
He turned the Christian Religion into the
official religion and forbid all competing religious ideologies. On this
conference, the African pictures of Mary and her child (Jesus) were replaced by
European images. Over the cross, there was written: In "Hoc Signo,
Vinces". It means "In this sign, you will conquer." And this is
exactly what the white racial armies had done in the world. Armed with one
weapon in one hand and a faked bible in the other. (There are over 125 existing
Bible versions. 1 wonder, if the true bible is among them, and which of the 125
versions it is.)
He ordered that Jesus has the same nature as
the "heavenly Father". Many of the 12 bishops protested against the
decision of Constantine. (for example bishop Arianus!) They believed, that
Jesus was not godly. But Constantine and the other bishops simply declared
these bishops to be heretics. So they could easily persecute and kill these
bishops.
The Christian trinity has not become a dogma by
the holy spirit, neither by a democratic decision, but because of the order of
a heathen Caesar, who was also a proven murderer.
The first Vatican conceal has declared in 1870
as a doctrine, that at least some dogmas can not be understood by naturally
principles, and that if there should be a contradiction between believe and
science, the error is on the side of the human science.
Pay attention on two quotations from the New
Testament: Jesus said:
"Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and
into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep
of the house of Israel. " (Mt 10: 5)
But they did not said what was ordered and missioned the Heathen. So a legalisation was needed and suddenly in the end of the gospel the order for the world‑mission was given.
"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,
baptising them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy
Ghost: "
These two quotations can also be used as an
example against the trinity, because if they had always stood in the gospel,
then 1. the church should have known anything about the trinity before the
third century. 2. The council of Nicea, which had to establish the status of
Jesus and his heavenly Father, would not be necessary. 3. the Arian dispute
would never happen, because if this quotation stood in the bible from the
beginning, Arianus would have not been against the definition of the same
nature of Jesus with his Father.
A
faking to proof the trinity in
the New Testament
'Tor there are three that bear record in
heaven, the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. (1
Joh 5:7)
This insertion is
missing in nearly all Greek
scriptures and in all translations. No church‑father used it before the
4th century. No Tertullian, no Cyprian, no Hyronimus and no Augustin used it.
In North‑Africa or in Spain it appears for the first time in the year
380. R. Simon doubted it for the first time in 1689. Today nearly experts do
not accept it. But on the 13th January 1897 an order of the roman officious
declares its authensity, (Today it is found again in the scripture. It is only
mentioned, that it is not an original text.)
A
comparison of the creed of Rome
with the creed of the conceal of Nicea
Comparison in the most important points with
the one of Rome.
|
Rome (150 A.D.) |
Nicäa (325 A.D.) |
|
1 believe in God the all powerful Father and an Jesus Christ --------------------------------- |
We believe in one God the all powerful Father and in one Lord, Jesus Christ with the same nature as the Father |
|
who was born
|
----------------------------------- |
|
--------------------------------- by the virgin Mary crucified under Pontius Pilate ... |
who came down became a Human suffered ... |
(From Anton Mayer: "the censored
Jesus")
The conceal of Nicea in the year 325 says, that
Jesus has the same nature as God‑father, and that the father has come
down to become a Human. So for the Christians Jesus is God. But many quotations
in the Bible are speaking against this statement.