IS THE BIBLE THE WORD OF GOD?
The Muslims believe, in the Thora, but not in
the Thora, in which the Jews and the Christians believe in. It has been changed
and therefore cannot demand to be the word of God, because it has been
manipulated and changed by the hand of man. Moses for example is not the author
of the "five books of Moses". lf he was the author, then there would
not be written:
"And the Lord spoke unto Moses...",
"And Moses spoke unto the Lord..."
This and over 7.000 other statements show, that
a) not Moses and b) not God was the author, but c) at least a third person had
written these books.
At one part of the five books of Moses, his own
death and obituary is being written. And how should Moses, as the author, has
been able to write that?
The Muslims also believe in the New Testament.
But not in the Testament, in which the Christians believe in. It has also been
changed and therefore cannot demand to be the word of God, because it has been
manipulated and changed by the hand of man. Jesus preached his decibels the
gospel, but which? Only a little part of the 27 books of the NT can be accepted
as the word of Jesus. lt is also like that, that there is a gospel according to
Matthew, a gospel according to Mark, a gospel according to Luke and a gospel
according to John, but there is no gospel of Jesus.
The word "according" is always been
used, to show, that these persons never wrote the gospels.
It is also astonishing, that Matthew has copied
a lot of things from Mark, because the gospel according to Mark is nearer to
Jesus. But the question is, why an eye‑ and earwittness of Jesus, which
the decibel Matthew was, according to his own gospel (Mt 9..9), has not written
his own original impressions, but started to copy/steal the scriptures of a
boy, who was about 10 years old, when he was involved to Jesus. Why should an
eye‑ and earwittnes copy the scriptures of a boy, who wrote his
scriptures only by hearing of the others.
By the way, about which bible‑version are
we talking anyway?
There is a "Revised Standard
Version", a "King James Version", a "Roman‑Catholic
Version", a "Luther Version" etc.
Although the Roman‑Catholic Version is
one of the oldest, it is not been accepted by the Protestants, because it
includes seven books, which are counted as doubtful, That is the reason, why in
the Protestant version, the following books are missing: Judith, Tobias,
Baruch, Esther etc. (If these books are not the word of God, why are they
standing in the Roman Catholic Version? And in which part of the so called
godly bible should one believe now?)
Further on ‑ 1000/oig copied
2 Kings 19:1‑37 and Isaiah 37‑A‑38.
(Who copied who?)
"Godly Mistakes"
2 Samuel 24 and 1Chronicles 2 1,
2 Samuel 24:13 and 1Chronicles 21: 11
2 Chronicles 36:9 and 2 Kings 24:8,
2Samuel 10: 18 and 1Chronicles 19:18,
1Kings 7:26 and 2Chronicles 4:5;
2Chronicles 9:25 and 1Kings 4:26
The books of the bible
|
Genesis: |
Author: Generally Moses |
|
Exodus: |
Author: Generally Moses |
|
Levitikus: |
Author: Generally Moses |
|
Numeri: |
Author: Generally Moses |
|
Deuteronomium: |
Author: Generally Moses |
|
Josua: |
Author: Mainly Joshua |
|
Richter: |
Author: Maybe Samuel |
|
Ruth: |
Author: Not definitely known. maybe Samuel |
|
1 Samuel: |
Author: Unknown |
|
1 Könige: |
Author: Unknown |
|
2 Könige: |
Author: Unknown |
|
1 Chroniken: |
Author: Maybe edited by Ezra |
|
2 Chroniken: |
Author: Maybe edited by Ezra |
|
Ezra: |
Author: Maybe edited by Ezra |
|
Esther: |
Author: Unknown |
|
Jiob: |
Author: Unknown |
|
Pslams: |
Author: Mainly David, although, there are
other writers too |
|
Jesaja: |
Author: Unknown |
|
Habakuk: |
Author: Nothing known about the place or time
of the birth |
etc.
This Chapter is being written, that the reader
learns more about the Bible. He will read things here, which he will not expect
in "the book of God".
For me, this is one example, to show, that the
Bible is not "the book of God". Because "a book of God"
should be guidance and measurement for the own lifestyle. But if you would
behave according to the bible, then this would surely lead to the total
destruction of the human civilisation. It (maybe) was once was the book of God,
but unfortunately people changed it by the times and first replaced God's words
through their own. So they lost the original scriptures and by this then they
also lost the original context of the scriptures.